Immigration Reform: A Common-Sense Approach
Why Democrats must not be afraid to support both border security and compassion
As a proud Californian and an unwavering supporter of immigrants, I’ve seen firsthand how immigrants shape and strengthen our communities. They work tirelessly in essential industries, raise families, and contribute to the cultural richness that makes America unique. Immigrants are, and always have been, an integral part of the American story. But as the incoming Trump administration prepares to take a hardline approach to immigration, it’s more important than ever that Democrats adopt a sensible approach- one that prioritizes both the security of our nation and compassion for those who contribute to it.
The incoming administration’s proposals to ramp up deportations through ICE and limit asylum protections raise serious concerns. The use of extrajudicial actions and a focus on aggressive enforcement strategies risk undermining the values that make America a beacon of hope and opportunity. However, as Democrats, we must also acknowledge that the American public, across party lines, largely supports measures that strengthen border security and address illegal immigration, particularly when it comes to deporting criminals and enforcing the law. Nuance is key to bridging the divide and crafting policies that reflect the intended mandate of the majority.
The fact is that a significant portion of the public wants to see stronger enforcement measures at the border and the deportation of individuals who have committed crimes or who are in the country illegally. This is not a call to abandon immigrants or disregard their contributions; rather, it’s an acknowledgment that a fair and functional immigration system must include adherence to our laws.
Under President Obama, nearly 3 million people were deported, with the primary focus on criminals and those who posed a threat to public safety. Similarly, President Bill Clinton’s administration was known for its efforts to secure the border and regulate illegal immigration. Both presidents were deeply committed to supporting immigrants but understood that security and law enforcement must also play a role in any comprehensive immigration policy.
There is a fundamental difference between enforcing border security, problem solving and promoting harmful, exclusionary rhetoric. It’s crucial to separate the two. Ensuring that individuals who break the law and pose a threat to our safety are removed from the country is common sense. This does not equate to hating immigrants or demonizing entire communities. We cannot allow the discussion to be hijacked by those on the far-right who paint all immigrants as criminals, nor by those on the far-left who deny the need for any form of enforcement. We must push for policies that recognize the distinction between a desire for security and the fear-driven politics and bigotry of nativism. The vast majority of Americans support a balanced approach that secures our borders while protecting those who contribute to our country in positive ways.
Democrats should not shy away from supporting strong border security or taking steps to deport individuals who are unlawfully in the country, particularly those who have committed crimes. Taking such a stance does not make us “anti-immigrant” or “hardliners”; rather, it positions us as responsible, pragmatic lawmakers who understand the complexities of immigration and its impact on our society. It is possible to support border security while also recognizing that our immigration system should be humane and just. This balance, however, must be achieved through the proper legislative process, not through executive fiat or overreaching mandates.
The assertion of unilateral executive orders and authority may provide short-term solutions, but it bypasses the vital role that Congress should play in shaping policy. Laws crafted through the legislative process are more durable and represent a true reflection of the American people's values. By working through Congress, we can ensure that any immigration reforms are both effective and fair, allowing for bipartisan support and lasting change. Executive actions may be politically expedient and may bring temporary solutions, but they fail to address the root causes or build the consensus needed for sustainable policies.
We have seen in recent years that bipartisan solutions to immigration reform are not only possible but necessary. In 2024, Senator James Lankford introduced an immigration bill that was fairly conservative but still found support from a number of Democrats, demonstrating that many lawmakers recognize the need for compromise. The fact that this proposal gained traction is proof that the issue is not one of ideological extremes, but one that requires a practical, centrist approach. Democrats should take this opportunity to embrace a sensible compromise that serves the interests of both national security and the immigrant community.
The reality is that the vast majority of Americans fall in the common-sense middle when it comes to immigration. Most people understand that border security is necessary for the safety of our nation. They also believe in providing a fair path to citizenship for those who contribute positively to our society, such as the DREAMers who have been here since they were children. It’s time for Democrats to demonstrate leadership by finding common ground, creating solutions and working with Republicans to pass comprehensive immigration reform that reflects the views and priorities of the American people.
I am so thankful for this . It provided a an approach the harm vs good with levels of balance rather than harsh treatment from the one branch of government. As an immigrant myself in the midst of clamor daily my deepest wish is to compromise for the good and in service of the human family when it comes to immigration . Written with meaning and grace for both sides . 👏👏